Remove Clinic Remove Manufacturing Remove Medical Remove Webinar
article thumbnail

Let’s Listen to Patients: FDA Releases Final Guidance on Patient Engagement in the Design and Conduct of Medical Device Clinical Studies

FDA Law

Bauer, Senior Regulatory Drug Expert — Our readers probably know that we value and advocate for patient engagement as an essential component in the development of medical products (see our firm’s commitment here ). Valentine & Larry J.

article thumbnail

FDA’s New Draft Guidance on 510(k) Implant Devices: What You Need to Know

FDA Law

By Philip Won & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert — As we recently blogged , FDA released three draft guidance documents to help enhance the predictability, consistency, and transparency of the 510(k) program. We find that this information is noteworthy for manufacturers to consider.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A Final LDT Rule in April!? Will FDA be prepared?

FDA Law

6] It is inconsistent to say that LDTs must be regulated as medical devices because of the newness of the tests and then reduce the cost of the proposed regulation by declaring that half of all LDTs will be exempt from premarket review. That seems very unlikely to be the case, because exemptions apply only to well-established tests.

IT 69
article thumbnail

The FDA PDUFA VII Goals Letter (FY 2023-2027): A Review of Our Top 10 Commitments

FDA Law

STAR aims to facilitate earlier access to novel uses of existing therapies for patients with a serious condition with unmet medical needs. The sponsor then gets the review ball rolling by submitting all of the efficacy supplement minus the final clinical study reports and clinical summaries.

article thumbnail

Decades of LDT Tension Leads to an Epic Three-Hour Oral Argument

FDA Law

On February 19, 2025, Judge Sean Jordan in the Eastern District of Texas heard oral arguments in American Clinical Laboratory Association (ACLA) and the Association for Molecular Pathologys (AMP) [1] lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services. In contrast, AMP and ACLA both asserted that the rule would harm medical care.