Remove Blog Remove Government Remove Manufacturing Remove Provider
article thumbnail

Last Friday was a Good Day for Those Who Want to Litigate Against the Federal Government.

FDA Law

By JP Ellison — Last Friday, the Supreme Court delivered a trio of decisions making it easier to litigate against the federal government. That said, it’s hard to see how the score on Friday wasn’t 3 for regulated industry and 0 for the federal government. Reynolds Vapor Co. , Finally, in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc.

article thumbnail

HP&M Seeks Experienced Regulatory Expert

FDA Law

Our team assists clients with a wide variety of quality and manufacturing regulatory topics for drugs and biologics. Types of matters include: Developing regulatory strategy for manufacturing and related issues that arise in product development programs. Specifically, manufacturing/testing procedures and compliance with cGMPs.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

ACI To Host Multiple Events Featuring HP&M Speakers – Discounts Available to FDA Law Blog Readers

FDA Law

FDA Law Blog readers can use discount code S10-866-866L24.S Charles assists clients across a range of FDA-related regulatory matters by providing timely strategic advice on new drug and biologic development and helping them tackle complex regulatory issues. More information about the conference can be found here.

article thumbnail

FDA Publishes Discussion Paper Seeking Feedback on 3D Printing of Medical Devices at the Point of Care

FDA Law

In October 2014, FDA held a public workshop titled “Additive Manufacturing of Medical Devices: An Interactive Discussion on the Technical Considerations of 3D Printing.” The discussion paper provides an overview of FDA’s current approach to regulation of 3D-printed devices. use in education, construction, art, and jewelry).

Medical 98
article thumbnail

Arkansas Law Prohibiting Manufacturer 340B Contract Pharmacy Restrictions Upheld by 8th Circuit

FDA Law

By Faraz Siddiqui — As drug manufacturers battle the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) in federal courts over the role of 340B contract pharmacies, an Eighth Circuit decision to uphold a 2021 Arkansas law may render those cases inconsequential in that state. Code Ann. § 23-92-604(c)(1), (2) (Act 1103).

article thumbnail

Second Circuit Decision A Reminder that Alleged FDCA violations don’t always equal FCA violations

FDA Law

According to the allegations in the complaint, approval of the new Los Angeles manufacturing facility required a Prior Approval Supplement (PAS) and a Pre-Approval Inspection (PAI) of the facility. These CIP equipment qualification reports were provided to the FDA in support of its PAS and PAI to approve the new facility.

article thumbnail

FIFA Cases Hold Lessons for FDA-Regulated Companies – Organizations can be Victims of Their Own Employees’ Criminal Conduct

FDA Law

In its Compliance Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers , the HHS OIG notes: The OIG recognizes that the implementation of a compliance program may not entirely eliminate improper conduct from the operations of a pharmaceutical manufacturer. Generally speaking, that recognition has limits, however.