Remove 2026 Remove Consulting Remove Manufacturing Remove Patients
article thumbnail

The FDA PDUFA VII Goals Letter (FY 2023-2027): A Review of Our Top 10 Commitments

FDA Law Blog

From new initiatives to facilitate faster reviews for new indications under the Split Real Time Application Review (STAR) pilot program, to bringing new meetings under PDUFA goals, to continued support for rare diseases and incorporation of the patient voice, the goals letter revealed a good number of welcome announcements.

article thumbnail

Less than Meets the Eye: LDT Small Entity Compliance Guide Adds Little Insight

FDA Law Blog

Laboratories struggling to understand the myriad implications of being regulated as device “manufacturers” were hopeful that additional guidance would shed light on how to apply FDA’s existing medical device regulatory framework to their operations. 803), Reporting of Corrections and Removals (21 C.F.R. § 806) and Complaint Files (21 C.F.R.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

“TAP Dancing” Towards Faster Device Commercialization: CDRH’s Total Product Life Cycle Advisory (“TAP”) Program

FDA Law Blog

He highlighted the following key features of TAP: An Innovative Approach To provide proactive support and guidance to medical device manufacturers, FDA has introduced a new CDRH position known as the “TAP Advisor.” up to 225 total products enrolled through FY 2026 and up to 325 total products enrolled through FY 2027).

article thumbnail

Decades of LDT Tension Leads to an Epic Three-Hour Oral Argument

FDA Law Blog

Interestingly, counsel focused his arguments exclusively on parrying legal attacks, rather than arguing why the rule was necessary to protect patients. That, of course, is not unique to labs with LDTs; kit manufacturers also need to obtain those insights well before they begin studies.)