Remove 2012 Remove IT Remove Manufacturing Remove Patients
article thumbnail

News on FDA’s Quality Management Maturity Program-Maturity to Continually Improve and to not be Reactive

FDA Law Blog

FDA published two Federal Register Notices in October 2020 to recruit domestic drug product manufacturers of finished dosage forms and foreign manufacturers of active pharmaceutical ingredients to participate in the QMM Pilot Programs. FDA describes the QMM as “above-the-bar behaviors” that exceed good manufacturing practices (GMPs).

article thumbnail

Gabapentinoids – Gabapentin and Pregabalin: Tasce Bongiovanni, Donovan Maust and Nisha Iyer

GeriPal

The FDA-approved indications for gabapentin are only for treating patients with partial seizures or postherpetic neuralgia. valproic acid and gabapentin), in nursing homes, particularly patients with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. There are a lot of reasons that may explain the massive increase in use of these drugs.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Does the Drug Shortage White Paper Fall Short?

FDA Law Blog

For generic drug manufacturing facilities specifically, the numbers are 63% and 87%. The proposed Manufacturing Resiliency Assessment Program (MRAP) would be managed as a public-private partnership and would assign resilience scores to manufacturers of generic drugs, “based on an assessment of manufacturer practices and past performance.”

article thumbnail

Is The Skinny Label Back From the Dead?

FDA Law Blog

Specifically, Amarin alleged that Hikma’s label “teaches CV risk reduction” due to “a notice regarding side effects for patients with CV disease” and an absence of a statement that the generic “should not be used for the CV indication….” The Federal Circuit twice reversed the District Court decision at issue in GSK v. Teva from this case.

article thumbnail

Is The Skinny Label Back From the Dead?

FDA Law Blog

Specifically, Amarin alleged that Hikma’s label “teaches CV risk reduction” due to “a notice regarding side effects for patients with CV disease” and an absence of a statement that the generic “should not be used for the CV indication….” The Federal Circuit twice reversed the District Court decision at issue in GSK v. Teva from this case.